sometimes you have an input that you wire to lots of patchs, (and sometimes im lost in the spider webs).
is it recommanded or not to bring this input into the first subpatch, and in the sub patch relink this to an output (just straight in to out), so all subpatch are then in "serial" ), or is it lighter to expand the module to reuse inputs, or to keep spiderwebz?...
don't know if im clear.
Ie I got several swith that should send, 1, 2,3 ect,
should I put the input +1 in the subpatch to link every swich to the one before, or should this be done in the upper top main patch. I remember having seen a similar topic but couldn't refind it... cause oops 15percent CPU for my 8x5 clip matrix only dealing midi/data seems a bit too much no? I have to find optimisations, overall advices?)
optimisation question
Generally
- the cpu load is proportional to the number of wires and the number of modules,(except that some modules cost no cpu).
- in usine you can connect several wires to the same inlet but it's less efficient.
You just count the number of wires and modules in all the patch included sub-patches; the less is this number more efficient it is.
so in you case "it is lighter to expand the module to reuse inputs".
- the cpu load is proportional to the number of wires and the number of modules,(except that some modules cost no cpu).
- in usine you can connect several wires to the same inlet but it's less efficient.
You just count the number of wires and modules in all the patch included sub-patches; the less is this number more efficient it is.
so in you case "it is lighter to expand the module to reuse inputs".
Olivier Sens
www.brainmodular.com
www.brainmodular.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests
