Hi,
It would be nice, in order to - for example - use the conductor to recall a PM number without touching its own stored adjustments, a kind of hierarchical storing ?
"not stored in", what about dissociating conductor and PM ?
-
grego mondo
- Member
- Posts: 466
- Location: 22110 Rostrenen
- Contact:
+ 1
En attendant cordialement l'apocalypse ... 100% Usine !!
https://lesformesdufond.kaz.bzh/grego-mondo/
PC i7 2.6Ghz - Win11 / RME Fireface UFX
Tubas / Serpent / Music Box
Interfaces Midi / OSC / DMX
https://lesformesdufond.kaz.bzh/grego-mondo/
PC i7 2.6Ghz - Win11 / RME Fireface UFX
Tubas / Serpent / Music Box
Interfaces Midi / OSC / DMX
do you have noticed the "recall by conductor" option in PM?
can already do a good job?
can already do a good job?
Olivier Sens
www.brainmodular.com
www.brainmodular.com
-
La Tenaille
- Member
- Posts: 547
- Location: Saint Etienne (France)
- Contact:
My idea was for example to choose if a switch stored by the PM is (or not) stored by the conductor.
But I think I have the beginning of a solution : replacing my switches by a " button>toggle>PassIfChange " combination, then a "slave" led that reflects the button state.
Is the "recall by conductor" a kind of "stored/not stored in conductor" dedicated to the PM ?
But I think I have the beginning of a solution : replacing my switches by a " button>toggle>PassIfChange " combination, then a "slave" led that reflects the button state.
Is the "recall by conductor" a kind of "stored/not stored in conductor" dedicated to the PM ?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
